Comments on: Seattle Passes Do Not Mail Resolution!

By: Kylie Batt

Kylie Batt — Mon, 24 May 2010 16:48:45 +0000

Согласен, это забавное мнение... ....

By: Iduwagoq

Iduwagoq — Tue, 04 May 2010 23:33:47 +0000

Seattle Passes Do Not Mail Resolution! « Return to Offender: The Do Not Mail Blog…

…

By: Kylie Batt

Kylie Batt — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:13:07 +0000

хотелось бы... ....

By: Max

Max — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:44:14 +0000

Successfully stopped junk mail for 8 months now. It took me about an hour. This is the best source “do it yourself” I found so far. Let me know if there is a better one. But I do not have any mail at all, only equity line and couple of other bills. No solicitations. Hurray!!!

http://www.awakeningblog.com/stop-junk-mail.html

By: Jay

Jay — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:38:21 +0000

Hey Rocky,
We might as well employ those people to start digging holes and filling them back in again for all the economic benefit we get from junk mail. And we wouldn’t have to kill as many trees for paper, or pollute the environment with the toxic colored inks they use to print glossy full-color ads in junk mail.

Yes, some postal workers might have to find new jobs. Hopefully they will be jobs that actually benefit other people.

You’re welcome to keep getting junk in your mailbox if you like.

I don’t like.

By: Стас

Стас — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:31:50 +0000

Hazel thank you!

By: Dilly

Dilly — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:24:49 +0000

Way to go Hazel! I’ve been using POs over 20 years & they *do* work. I get at most one junk mailpiece per quarter & I mail an app to prohibit the sender the same day the letter carrier leaves the dung in my mailbox. Like you, my only problem has been “major telecommunication entity” — AT&T to be specific. My only recourse is to waste their time like they waste mine. You can read my earlier post about POs at http://www.donotmail.org/article.php?id=251 for details.

While it’s true we have no responsibility to continue employing postal workers (or any others for that matter) it’s true that postal service as we know it will cease if junk mail is abolished or prohibited. The USPS simply will not be able to continue as a going concern. Oh well, so be it.

Besides greeting cards, I mailed only five letters last year. ergo, if curtailment or the end of junk mail cockraoches & their litter means I can no longer send those cards via the USPS, c’est la vie. We’ll all get by somehow.

As stated in the post referenced above, I have several PO tips & tricks to share with anyone who’s wiling to invest the time to *really* stop the garbage disgorged into their mailboxes by the junk mail industry’s inconsiderate maggots. Write me at bluhfurble –at– yahoo –dot– com.

Best,
Dilly

By: Hazel

Hazel — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:41:10 +0000

We have no more obligation to keep postal workers employed to deliver junk mail than we do to keep sex workers employed or cigarette manufacturers in business.

The USPS Form PS1500 is a *very* effective way to stop individual junk mailers dead in their tracks. Of the dozens I’ve filed to date, only one, a major telecommunication entity, has violated the prohibitory order issued by the USPS on my behalf — and that entity violated the phohibitory order only once. The threat of a federal court appearance cooled their junk mail jets.

By: rocky

rocky — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:23:30 +0000

rocky says just kill me

By: Rocky

Rocky — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:16:17 +0000

This is so stupid! Do you people think beyond your own personal inconveniences? The post office is already laying off a lot of employees. The post office makes the most money off of junk mail and now that it’s banned, you can expect to see more layoffs all because you people don’t know how to recycle! Great job geniuses!